Merlissimo
Dołączył 13 paź 2008
Usunięta treść Dodana treść
Merlissimo (dyskusja | edycje) |
Merlissimo (dyskusja | edycje) →MerlBot@plwiki: re |
||
Linia 45:
::: Hi Merlissimo, thanks for the response. Ad 2) >>born cat missing<< is a very long list. It would be useful if it would only contain the articles that can be 'repaired', like in the death dates case. Ad 3) Yes indeed. But I would also like to have the 2nd-level heading before >>born cat missing<< list. Just for aesthetic reasons. ;) I think it would more clearly separate death-dates list from the birth-dates list. Would it break the code if I'll change the heading level? Thanks, --[[Wikipedysta:Mikołka|Mikołka]] ([[Dyskusja wikipedysty:Mikołka|dyskusja]]) 14:24, 9 mar 2012 (CET)
::::AFAIK it is possible to fix all articles from >>born cat missing<< (there is a [[:Kategoria:Nieznana data urodzin|category for a missing date]]) [[Wikipedysta:Bulwersator|-- Bulwersator]] ([[Dyskusja wikipedysty:Bulwersator|dyskusja]]) 17:22, 9 mar 2012 (CET)
@Delay - no problem, RL is more important :) [[Wikipedysta:Bulwersator|-- Bulwersator]] ([[Dyskusja wikipedysty:Bulwersator|dyskusja]]) 17:22, 9 mar 2012 (CET)
:::::Yes all entries should be fixable. There should be a local category for unkown date (has no born cat=missing != unkown=info is lost in history). On dewiki and other wikis there are also subcategores for millennium or century if the exact year is unkown (there are only very, very few people with unkown millennium). But this depends from wiki to wiki.
:::::I am still thinking about if i should implement a 2nd and 3rd order heading or only a 2nd order. [[Wikipedysta:Merlissimo|Merlissimo]] ([[Dyskusja wikipedysty:Merlissimo|dyskusja]]) 17:59, 9 mar 2012 (CET)
== Special tool ==
| |||