Plik:Hygrocybe coccineocrenata (Peck) Arnolds 555390.jpg
![Plik:Hygrocybe coccineocrenata (Peck) Arnolds 555390.jpg](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Hygrocybe_coccineocrenata_%28Peck%29_Arnolds_555390.jpg/800px-Hygrocybe_coccineocrenata_%28Peck%29_Arnolds_555390.jpg)
Rozmiar podglądu – 800 × 600 pikseli. Inne rozdzielczości: 320 × 240 pikseli | 640 × 480 pikseli | 1024 × 768 pikseli | 1280 × 960 pikseli | 2560 × 1920 pikseli | 3648 × 2736 pikseli.
Rozmiar pierwotny (3648 × 2736 pikseli, rozmiar pliku: 2,3 MB, typ MIME: image/jpeg)
Historia pliku
Kliknij na datę/czas, aby zobaczyć, jak plik wyglądał w tym czasie.
Data i czas | Miniatura | Wymiary | Użytkownik | Opis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
aktualny | 03:05, 15 mar 2018 | ![]() | 3648 × 2736 (2,3 MB) | Leoboudv | =={{int:filedesc}}== {{Information |Description='''''Hygrocybe coccineocrenata''''' var. sphagnophila (Peck) Arnolds Image location: York Co., Maine, USA Re: Hygrocybe coccineocrenata var. sphagnophila. Since you are the only person with an observation under this species, I thought I would pick your brain on the H.turunda group. Your species here looks to have been pulled out of the H.turunda group – is that assumption correct? And if so can the assumption take one more step and assume that H.turunda then stands alone as a good species? ………..I’m seeing a lot of small Hygrocybe with decurrent gills with squamulous that are clearly brown. So H.turunda? <div> <span> Recognized by sight: Reddish scales on pileus. [https://books.google.com/books?id=Z-xGzC7Nic4C&pg=PA98&lpg=PA98&dq=Hygrocybe+coccineocrenata+var.+sphagnophila&source=bl&ots=VL-A_KhQV5&sig=9Y02nKfb_g10zEnZLeVXxWpPVZ0&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwj_hYaEpK_MAhVDGR4KHSdBBeAQ6AEIMDAD#v=onepage&q=Hygroc... |
Lokalne wykorzystanie pliku
Poniższa strona korzysta z tego pliku: