Fizyka (Arystoteles): Różnice pomiędzy wersjami

[wersja nieprzejrzana][wersja nieprzejrzana]
Usunięta treść Dodana treść
Linia 14:
 
Arystoteles definiuje ruch jako możliwość takowego. Tomasz Akwinu sugerował że ten fragment należy rozumieć dosłownie – jako że ruch jest aktywnym wypełnianiem możliwości, jako przejście do możliwego stanu.
 
== Przyczynowość ==
 
Arystoteles postulował że przyczynę dowolnej zmiany można przypisać do czterech czynników kazualnych.
=== Przyczyna materialna ===
Przyczyna materialna opisuje materiał za pomocą tego z czego jest złożony. Dlatego przyczyną materialną stołu jest drewno, a przyczyną materialną samochodu jest guma i stal. Ta przyczyna nie określa akcji.
=== Przyczyna formalna ===
 
 
Causality, The Four Causes
Main article: Four causes
Aristotle suggested that the reason for anything coming about can be attributed to four different types of simultaneously active causal factors:
Material cause describes the material out of which something is composed. Thus the material cause of a table is wood, and the material cause of a car is rubber and steel. It is not about action. It does not mean one domino knocks over another domino.
The formal cause is its form, i.e., the arrangement of that matter. It tells us what a thing is, that any thing is determined by the definition, form, pattern, essence, whole, synthesis or archetype. It embraces the account of causes in terms of fundamental principles or general laws, as the whole (i.e., macrostructure) is the cause of its parts, a relationship known as the whole-part causation. Plainly put the formal cause is the idea existing in the first place as exemplar in the mind of the sculptor, and in the second place as intrinsic, determining cause, embodied in the matter. Formal cause could only refer to the essential quality of causation. A more simple example of the formal cause is the blueprint or plan that one has before making or causing a human made object to exist.
The efficient cause is "the primary source", or that from which the change or the ending of the change first starts. It identifies 'what makes of what is made and what causes change of what is changed' and so suggests all sorts of agents, nonliving or living, acting as the sources of change or movement or rest. Representing the current understanding of causality as the relation of cause and effect, this covers the modern definitions of "cause" as either the agent or agency or particular events or states of affairs. More simply again that which immediately sets the thing in motion. So take the two dominos this time of equal weighting, the first is knocked over causing the second also to fall over. This is effectively efficient cause.
Linia 27 ⟶ 30:
Optics
Aristotle held more accurate theories on some optical concepts than other philosophers of his day. The earliest known written evidence of a camera obscura can be found in Aristotle's documentation of such a device in 350 BC in Problemata. Aristotle's apparatus contained a dark chamber that had a single small hole, or aperture, to allow for sunlight to enter. Aristotle used the device to make observations of the sun and noted that no matter what shape the hole was, the sun would still be correctly displayed as a round object. In modern cameras, this is analogous to the diaphragm. Aristotle also made the observation that when the distance between the aperture and the surface with the image increased, the image was magnified.[26]
 
 
{{Stan prac|690|690|CF9|CF9|CF9}}